Re: +
cgroups-forbid-noprefix-if-mounting-more-than-just-cpuset-subsystem. patch
added to -mm tree
[Posted June 3, 2009 by corbet]
| From: |
| Andrew Morton <akpm-AT-linux-foundation.org> |
| To: |
| Dhaval Giani <dhaval-AT-linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
| Subject: |
| Re: +
cgroups-forbid-noprefix-if-mounting-more-than-just-cpuset-subsystem. patch
added to -mm tree |
| Date: |
| Tue, 2 Jun 2009 13:35:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID: |
| <20090602133534.d2e453f6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> |
| Cc: |
| menage-AT-google.com, lizf-AT-cn.fujitsu.com, balbir-AT-linux.vnet.ibm.com,
kamezawa.hiroyu-AT-jp.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org,
bharata-AT-linux.vnet.ibm.com, libcg-devel-AT-lists.sourceforge.net |
| Archive-link: |
| Article, Thread
|
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:10:42 +0530
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 09:08:04AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I am not sure if this is a good idea. For libcgroup, we would then be
> > > adding a special case for just cpuset. I would rather that we allow it
> > > either for all the subsystems or none of them.
> > >
> >
> > libcgroup shouldn't be using the noprefix option. Its only intentded
> > use is to allow the legacy "cpuset" filesystem type to be mounted and
> > to see the same fileset as it had before the cgroups transition.
> >
>
> It does not. But if some user is using that option, we need to be in a
> position to handle it.
>
> I am quite happy not supporting the noprefix option in the library if it
> is fine.
>
fyi, the above discussion transitions akpm into the "confused" state.
I'll keep the patch on hold until akpm transitions back out of that
state.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
(
Log in to post comments)