| |||||||||||||
That's silly. You can have strlcat() and strlcpy(), yet be compatibleThat's silly. You can have strlcat() and strlcpy(), yet be compatiblePosted May 23, 2009 11:51 UTC (Sat) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: That's silly. You can have strlcat() and strlcpy(), yet be compatible by liljencrantz Parent article: EGLIBC: Not a fork, but a glibc distribution
I'll have to dig it up. It didn't happen often and it was years and years
ago: I dithered about including it. It's not the real problem, to me: maybe he changed his mind and forgot the original contribution had ever existed, which is fine. The real problem is his attitude to contributions.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||