| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
That's silly. You can have strlcat() and strlcpy(), yet be compatibleThat's silly. You can have strlcat() and strlcpy(), yet be compatiblePosted May 23, 2009 10:04 UTC (Sat) by liljencrantz (subscriber, #28458)In reply to: That's silly. You can have strlcat() and strlcpy(), yet be compatible by nix Parent article: EGLIBC: Not a fork, but a glibc distribution
I am sorry, I did not. My bad. On the other hand, I do not think the same argument was ironic when used to motivate Debians use of eglibc.
(Log in to post comments)
That's silly. You can have strlcat() and strlcpy(), yet be compatible Posted May 23, 2009 11:37 UTC (Sat) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]
The point isn't strfry() et al. It's that Ulrich's behaviour towards
someone trying to fix a bug in that exemplifies his behaviour towards *anyone* trying to contribute *anything*, except if he's known them a long time (and sometimes not even then).
I could dig up dozens of examples but it's too depressing and it's a bank
|
|
||||||||||||