Transmageddon and Arista pursue simple transcoding
Posted May 21, 2009 19:07 UTC (Thu) by
jimparis (subscriber, #38647)
In reply to:
Transmageddon and Arista pursue simple transcoding by pr1268
Parent article:
Transmageddon and Arista pursue simple transcoding
I'm tempted to try out either of Transmageddon or Arista, assuming I can
wade through the dependency hell I'm facing
It always seems like video transcoding devolves into dependency hell -- not necessarily of the gnome/kde variety that you mention, but the fact that external tools and libraries are required to actually perform the transcoding. And these tools then get compiled with a variety of different options and enabled formats, so you can't just tell whether they will work from the version number. On one of my systems:
$ apt-cache policy ffmpeg
ffmpeg:
Installed: 3:20080706-0.3lenny1
Candidate: 3:20080706-0.3lenny1
Version table:
5:0.5+svn20090508-0.1 0
80 http://www.debian-multimedia.org testing/main Packages
50 http://www.debian-multimedia.org unstable/main Packages
4:0.5+svn20090420-2 0
50 http://debian.lcs.mit.edu unstable/main Packages
*** 3:20080706-0.3lenny1 0
990 http://www.debian-multimedia.org stable/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
3:0.svn20090303-1 0
80 http://debian.lcs.mit.edu testing/main Packages
0.svn20080206-17+lenny1 0
990 http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages
0.svn20080206-17 0
990 http://debian.lcs.mit.edu stable/main Packages
Now I understand that half the confusion here is from having the same package in debian-multimedia and Debian proper, but they're fundamentally different because the debian-multimedia one is often compiled against more non-free codecs.
I'd really, really love to see something like Arista as a standard package in Debian with properly vetted dependencies that make sure we're getting a known-good version of all the tools and libraries they use.
(
Log in to post comments)