| |||||||||||||
That's silly. You can have strlcat() and strlcpy(), yet be compatibleThat's silly. You can have strlcat() and strlcpy(), yet be compatiblePosted May 21, 2009 4:30 UTC (Thu) by JoeBuck (subscriber, #2330)In reply to: That's silly. You can have strlcat() and strlcpy(), yet be compatible by xilun Parent article: EGLIBC: Not a fork, but a glibc distribution Yes, exactly. A binary that works with eglibc should work with glibc, so eglibc has to be a proper subset. It's supposed to be glibc with the option to strip it down, hence the "e".
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||