Re: [RFC] TuxOnIce
[Posted May 13, 2009 by jake]
| From: |
| Pavel Machek <pavel-AT-ucw.cz> |
| To: |
| "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-AT-sisk.pl> |
| Subject: |
| Re: [RFC] TuxOnIce |
| Date: |
| Thu, 7 May 2009 23:51:12 +0200 |
| Message-ID: |
| <20090507215112.GC14611@elf.ucw.cz> |
| Cc: |
| linux-pm-AT-lists.linux-foundation.org, Nigel Cunningham <nigel-AT-tuxonice.net>,
tuxonice-devel-AT-lists.tuxonice.net, linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org |
| Archive-link: |
| Article, Thread
|
On Thu 2009-05-07 19:42:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday 07 May 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > I'd like to submit TuxOnIce for review, with a view to seeking to get it
> > > merged, perhaps in 2.6.31 or .32 (depending upon what needs work before
> > > it can be merged) and the willingness of those who matter.
...
> > To summarise disadvantages:
> >
> > - only core has 8000 LoC
> > - it does stuff that can be easily done in userspace
> > (and that todays distros _do_ in userspace).
> > - it duplicates uswsusp functionality.
> > - compared to [u]swsusp, it received little testing
>
> Actually, I see advantages of working together versus fighting flame wars.
> Please stop that, I'm not going to take part in it this time.
Ok, so what do you propose? Merging tuxonice into 2.6.32, resulting in
having swsusp,uswsusp *and* tuxonice to maintain? I hope not.
If we are talking about improving mainline to allow tuxonice
functionality... then yes, that sounds reasonable.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo...
(
Log in to post comments)