Posted May 8, 2009 17:00 UTC (Fri) by mbaldessari (guest, #36769)
Parent article: OpenOffice.org 3.1 released
One of my main wishes regarding the future of OO.org is a reduction of code lines in order to replace OO-only libraries and code, with more used libraries (vcl->qt|gtk, dmake->cmake, etc.). It would be easier to hack on it and maybe get some more traction from community developers.
Posted May 8, 2009 17:53 UTC (Fri) by bangert (subscriber, #28342)
[Link]
well, start coding then...
www.koffice.org
OpenOffice.org 3.1 released
Posted May 8, 2009 23:17 UTC (Fri) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)
[Link]
Koffice is no replacement and not even close. There simply is no replacement for Openoffice.org for many people.
OpenOffice.org 3.1 released
Posted May 9, 2009 3:06 UTC (Sat) by Kit (guest, #55925)
[Link]
That sounds rather familiar... Moving OpenOffice up to the first sentence, and adding Microsoft Office to the second... interesting! But on a serious note, just because KOffice isn't there *yet* doesn't mean it can't get there (especially if it had similar backing to that of OpenOffice!).