| |||||||||||||
Here's hoping strlcat gets inHere's hoping strlcat gets inPosted May 7, 2009 9:25 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: Here's hoping strlcat gets in by epa Parent article: Debian switching to EGLIBC
It breaks compatibility in that adding a function to eglibc means that you
can no longer reliably replace eglibc with glibc. (Whether this is problematic is another matter.)
(Log in to post comments)
Here's hoping strlcat gets in Posted May 7, 2009 12:05 UTC (Thu) by epa (subscriber, #39769) [Link]
Obviously, fixing the ARM bug linked in the article also means that you can no longer reliably replace eglibc with glibc, since this would break (or at least break the build) on previously working ARM systems. I think your definition of compatibility is a bit too strict.
|
|||||||||||||