I wonder why the Unladen swallow developers start fresh with an LLVM
backend, when with Parrot, there's already an effort on it's way to do a
register-based VM Python implementation. Seems like duplicated effort for
no obvious gain to me.
Posted May 7, 2009 9:26 UTC (Thu) by brouhaha (subscriber, #1698)
[Link]
Does Parrot compile to native code? (I haven't looked at it in that much detail.) LLVM generally does. LLVM also has a large number of optional optimization passes that can be applied.
On the other hand, the semantic level of LLVM is somewhat lower than that of Parrot.
Unladen swallow: accelerating Python
Posted May 11, 2009 19:45 UTC (Mon) by chromatic (guest, #26207)
[Link]
Parrot has a nascent JIT, but it doesn't currently compile to native code. Parrot's intent right now is to provide excellent compiler tools so that multiple languages can interoperate at a calling conventions level. Optimization is a secondary priority. (It's still a priority, but it's not the primary priority at the moment.)
Unladen swallow: accelerating Python
Posted May 7, 2009 10:55 UTC (Thu) by Frej (subscriber, #4165)
[Link]
I don't think that using LLVM is starting from fresh.
It has been used by Apple in their graphics pipeline from OS X 10.5
It's the future of some linux drivers as well, known as gallium3D. I think it has already been merged....