| |||||||||||||
Debian switching to EGLIBCDebian switching to EGLIBCPosted May 6, 2009 20:04 UTC (Wed) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: Debian switching to EGLIBC by drag Parent article: Debian switching to EGLIBC
Yes. And the compiled code for it is perhaps 200 bytes. It's literally
just a bunch of printf()s. That, at least, is not worth forking over.
(Log in to post comments)
Debian switching to EGLIBC Posted May 6, 2009 20:09 UTC (Wed) by ikm (subscriber, #493) [Link]
Doh... That was a joke! I guess it contained too much truth for some :)
Debian switching to EGLIBC Posted May 6, 2009 20:37 UTC (Wed) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]
I've seen people arguing exactly your joke, seriously, in the past. They
tended to be BSD people.
Some also argued apparently seriously that malloc() and dynamic memory
Debian switching to EGLIBC Posted May 6, 2009 20:45 UTC (Wed) by ikm (subscriber, #493) [Link]
Actually, yes, I'm with them on this one. Oh no, I should stop I think.
Debian switching to EGLIBC Posted May 7, 2009 4:05 UTC (Thu) by csamuel (✭ supporter ✭, #2624) [Link]
Probably HPC - we're an odd bunch.. ;-)
|
|||||||||||||