Not logged in
Log in now
Create an account
Subscribe to LWN
LWN.net Weekly Edition for December 5, 2013
Deadline scheduling: coming soon?
LWN.net Weekly Edition for November 27, 2013
ACPI for ARM?
LWN.net Weekly Edition for November 21, 2013
Posted Apr 28, 2009 15:34 UTC (Tue) by pr1268 (subscriber, #24648)
Which may have been a bad idea to begin with.
Posted Apr 28, 2009 22:14 UTC (Tue) by jordanb (guest, #45668)
Netscape was losing marketshare like crazy when the code was released. It had little to do with the long release time for Mozilla 1.0. Also, the code that Netscape released was unbuildable. They basically ripped out anything that had a copyright question on it so all you got an incoherent blob of C code that nobody understood. So the long release time had was mostly a result of trying to figure out what they had and how they'd go about turning it into a functioning computer program.
2) I've poked around in the Mozilla codebase and there is a TON of "mcom" stuff in there. So if there was a serious effort to rewrite it (I don't think there was) they sure did leave a lot of truly ancient code.
Posted Apr 29, 2009 7:59 UTC (Wed) by sdalley (subscriber, #18550)
Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds