| |||||||||||||
A privilege escalation flaw in udevA privilege escalation flaw in udevPosted Apr 23, 2009 0:39 UTC (Thu) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313)In reply to: A privilege escalation flaw in udev by nix Parent article: A privilege escalation flaw in udev
there is a mount option to deny the ability to use device nodes on a filesystem, but it's seldom used nowdays (the benifit from splitting up the filesystem into many slices is outweighed by the inconvienience of dealing with the many slices)
(Log in to post comments)
A privilege escalation flaw in udev Posted Apr 23, 2009 15:24 UTC (Thu) by Tet (subscriber, #5433) [Link]
I'd say LVM fixed that inconvenience long ago, and the benefits of multiple filesystems are still there. I can't really understand why anyone would go with a single large root filesystem.
A privilege escalation flaw in udev Posted Apr 24, 2009 10:37 UTC (Fri) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]
It can be tricky to get LVM aligned properly for LVM-atop-RAID, and if you
get it wrong you get a silent substantial slowdown...
(RAID-atop-LVM is not prone to this because you don't get the same excess
|
|||||||||||||