Oracle buying Sun
Oracle buying Sun
Posted Apr 20, 2009 14:39 UTC (Mon) by masoncl (subscriber, #47138)In reply to: Oracle buying Sun by knobunc
Parent article: Oracle buying Sun
Posted Apr 20, 2009 17:10 UTC (Mon)
by fuhchee (guest, #40059)
[Link]
Posted Apr 20, 2009 19:00 UTC (Mon)
by vaurora (guest, #38407)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Apr 20, 2009 20:43 UTC (Mon)
by jd (guest, #26381)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Apr 20, 2009 23:30 UTC (Mon)
by xoddam (guest, #2322)
[Link]
Posted Apr 20, 2009 19:24 UTC (Mon)
by sbishop (guest, #33061)
[Link] (2 responses)
On a general note, I am trying to see how all of this is going affect Linux and Java--I don't care much about MySQL--and from my perspective it isn't looking good. But I would love to be proved wrong!
Posted Apr 20, 2009 20:03 UTC (Mon)
by knobunc (guest, #4678)
[Link] (1 responses)
The consequences being:
(Tangentially... I wonder if they will open up dtrace's licensing too).
-ben
Posted Apr 20, 2009 22:45 UTC (Mon)
by trasz (guest, #45786)
[Link]
Oracle buying Sun
Oracle buying Sun
Oracle buying Sun
LNQOL!
Btrfs and ZFS under the same roof
Btrfs and ZFS under the same roof
A) Oracle decides to play nice and give ZFS to Linux by changing the licensing
B) Oracle decides they want to protect ZFS
C) Oracle doesn't care about this either way
A) Oracle kills funding supporting Btrfs work
B) Oracle kills funding supporting Btrfs work AND gets hostile with the patents
C) Oracle does nothing and perhaps keeps funding Btrfs
Btrfs and ZFS under the same roof
use these patents, and this will apply to the existing code even if Oracle decides to relicense ZFS
under a more restrictive license.