| |||||||||||||
Re: Red Hat Opts for Pragmatism Over Glitz (NY Times)Re: Red Hat Opts for Pragmatism Over Glitz (NY Times)Posted Apr 8, 2009 17:59 UTC (Wed) by nevyn (subscriber, #33129)In reply to: Red Hat Opts for Pragmatism Over Glitz (NY Times) by dmarti Parent article: Red Hat Opts for Pragmatism Over Glitz (NY Times)
So a story from over 6 months ago, suggesting that Canonical are going to do something similar to https://www.redhat.com/wapps/isvcatalog/ means that they are going to make money for the desktop?
I appreciate everyone loves Canonical and hates Red Hat, but that doesn't change the reality that nobody is willing to pay for the desktop (and thus. nobody can make money from it).
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||