| |||||||||||||
"Any OS" is clearly wrong."Any OS" is clearly wrong.Posted Apr 5, 2009 16:44 UTC (Sun) by RobSeace (subscriber, #4435)In reply to: "Any OS" is clearly wrong. by khim Parent article: Light and Cheap, Netbooks Are Poised to Reshape PC Industry (New York Times)
> Non-XWindow- based system is clearly not Linux for them.
What a bizarre concept... So, you're saying that a Linux server with no running (or perhaps even installed) X server is not really running "Linux", whatever that means?? I'm sorry, but that's simply insane... I can think of no one whose definition of "Linux" is tied to X at all... (Plus, if X and the related desktop environments are what supposedly define "Linux", then does that mean that every other system that X and they run on are now also "Linux"? That makes absolutely zero sense...)
(Log in to post comments)
"Any OS" is clearly wrong. Posted Apr 5, 2009 19:53 UTC (Sun) by sim0nx (subscriber, #23065) [Link]
hahaha lol
|
|||||||||||||