| |||||||||||||
A GNOME 3.0 planA GNOME 3.0 planPosted Apr 5, 2009 3:58 UTC (Sun) by Ze (guest, #54182)In reply to: A GNOME 3.0 plan by drag Parent article: A GNOME 3.0 plan
>>B.If QT is good and it is using C++ then what is the point to having two QTs? Why not just use KDE instead of Gnome? Why not just get rid of Gnome altogether if you think it should be all C++ or that it should be QT.. you already have everything you want, right?
How about because QT is nearly as hacky as GTK+? Some of us would like a nice C++ library that uses standard libraries (or boost) and not some Hack that relies on Macro's and throws away type safety.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||