Actually... I meant it both ways: the article never mentions freedom of modification and redistribution, and I didn't know that Canonical or Xandros would make hardware makers pay for their distros (thought it was $0). Is it because they're including non-free components specially for them?
Posted Apr 4, 2009 19:48 UTC (Sat) by man_ls (subscriber, #15091)
[Link]
Xandros is indeed a non-free distribution (you cannot redistribute it freely). Ubuntu is mostly free (except for branded components I guess). I am not sure about the netbook distro, but it is probably the same; in any case a hardware maker could download a copy, remove all proprietary components and add back whatever they like. But OEMs pay for customization and integration anyway; in the end it is a per-unit fee quite similar to a license, albeit (in this case) much lower.
The above is pretty much speculation, but the real picture should not be too far off.