|| ||Linus Torvalds <torvalds-AT-linux-foundation.org> |
|| ||Mark Fasheh <mfasheh-AT-suse.com> |
|| ||Re: [git patches] Ocfs2 updates for 2.6.30 |
|| ||Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:13:11 -0700 (PDT)|
|| ||linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel-AT-oss.oracle.com,
Joel Becker <joel.becker-AT-oracle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm-AT-linux-foundation.org>|
|| ||Article, Thread
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> Here is the Ocfs2 changes for this merge window. I sent all these
> patches out to the list a couple weeks ago. Original mail is attached.
Hmm. And I can _guarantee_ that none of these patches were actually tested
as-is, because they were all rebased just minutes before the send.
- top commit:
Commit: Mark Fasheh <firstname.lastname@example.org>
CommitDate: Fri Apr 3 11:39:26 2009 -0700
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 11:46:05 -0700
From: Mark Fasheh <email@example.com>
So any possible subtle interactions with any other changes would never
have been tested very much before the "please pull".
Are they likely? Probably not. But that's not the point. The point is that
you barely had time to compile that thing, much less give it any testing.
The whole "it compiles, it's perfect, ship it" mentality is _strictly_
only for me.
Quod licet Jovi, non licet bovi.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
to post comments)