LWN.net Logo

GCC debates project governance

GCC debates project governance

Posted Apr 2, 2009 13:23 UTC (Thu) by stock (guest, #5849)
Parent article: GCC debates project governance

The OpenSource Economy was even during the early 90 the best of the
world. Once you understand that outsourcing of valuable source-code to
China is actually robbery at bright daylight, in Doc Searls's
terminology as uttered at the linuxjournal.com issue of Apr 01,
2002, you then understand that it is actually a Communist heist on
Open Source America.

Remove the undercover communists in sheeps clothing from the open
source municipalities. Remove undercover KGB/FSB types from key IT
Branches inside the USA. Remove the Russian and Chinese nomenklatura
Mafia from America, who heisted CEO's, Board of Directors and their
families like the sleep-over bandits, in order to get the outsourcing
game of opensource going.

and then remove the covert Trotskyite's from Washington D.C., You
know, these so-called former NSA types, next clean up congress,
then America's ICT Branch will run like a brand-new engine again.

You cannot migrate to a "new information technology" after throwing
your old shoes away, you still need them to move there.

The Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme? That's a Neo-Con ICT Consultant robbery
of the American IT Industry. What's a Neo-Con ICT Consultant? Its types
from behind the iron curtain, who have never ran Linux, who decorated
themselves with Linux names from the past, and are hard-core criminals
supported by Putin's FSB/KGB and inside America through the MOSSAD/NSA.


(Log in to post comments)

GCC debates project governance

Posted Apr 2, 2009 17:49 UTC (Thu) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]

Wow. Kook overload, sufficiently incoherent that it's unclear what, if
anything, this has to do with a GCC-versus-FSF internecine grumblefest. Is
stock accusing the FSF of being communists? Is he accusing everyone *else*
of being a communist, or perhaps a Russian? What drugs is he on, and why
aren't they illegal?

I don't like Windows much, but not even I would suggest that people that
prefer Windows to Linux are 'hard-core criminals 'supported by Putin's
FSB/KGB and inside America through the MOSSAD/NSA'. (Heh. I had no idea
that the NSA, Mossad and the FSB were in cahoots. Still less did I realise
that the UK Government is populated entirely by FSB agents, judging by the
UK's wholehearted and expensive embrace of MS over the last decade or so.
One wonders why, after a takeover of that magnitude, they proceeded to
have a major diplomatic *spat* with Russia over a little matter of
polonium poisoning... perhaps stock's ravings are not entirely accurate.
But no, that's fantasy.)

No range seems safe now

Posted Apr 3, 2009 22:28 UTC (Fri) by man_ls (subscriber, #15091) [Link]

We cannot even trust subscribers any more, not even those in the subscriber#<10k range... Is even the <5k range safe? Nix?

No range seems safe now

Posted Apr 3, 2009 23:57 UTC (Fri) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]

Certainly the sub-5000 range is no oasis of sanity if that range includes
me! (Although Robert 'shares RMS's initials' Stockmann has been a net.kook
for a long, long time: I can remember him from only a few weeks after I
got on the net for the first time, and he was just the same then. Though
this was a particularly impressive outburst even by his standards.)

... but, no. There is no safety. It's contagious: in six months' time
it'll reach down into the hundreds and start attacking contributors too.
In a year's time the rot will have spread to subscriber #1, and corbet
will release the source code to the all-new LWN, with commenting
restricted to people with names containing the letter 'A', a colour scheme
of radioactive pink and puce...

... written in ASP.NET.

And it's all my fault.

Er, sorry?

Thanks for the laugh

Posted Apr 4, 2009 9:26 UTC (Sat) by man_ls (subscriber, #15091) [Link]

So we get a LWN Flying Circus edition and source code? Too good to be true! :D

No range seems safe now

Posted Apr 6, 2009 13:52 UTC (Mon) by fatrat (subscriber, #1518) [Link]

It had the virtue of being a funny rant, even if unintentionally so.

GCC debates project governance

Posted Apr 3, 2009 16:52 UTC (Fri) by hppnq (guest, #14462) [Link]

In function 'main':
Stock comment: 1: error: 'Open Source' undeclared in "early 90".

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds