Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13)
[Posted April 1, 2009 by jake]
| From: |
| kenner-AT-vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) |
| To: |
| bonzini-AT-gnu.org |
| Subject: |
| Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13) |
| Date: |
| Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:07:01 EDT |
| Message-ID: |
| <10903202307.AA26704@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> |
| Cc: |
| Joe.Buck-AT-synopsys.com, dave.korn.cygwin-AT-googlemail.com, dberlin-AT-dberlin.org, dje.gcc-AT-gmail.com, gcc-AT-gcc.gnu.org, law-AT-redhat.com, rguenther-AT-suse.de, stevenb.gcc-AT-gmail.com |
| Archive-link: |
| Article, Thread
|
> > The GCC maintainers work on behalf of the FSF and in some matters defer
> > to the FSF. It's that simple.
>
> Yes, but it's not written anywhere that release and especially branching
> policies are one of this matters.
The matters to which we defer to the FSF are any matters that they *ask*
us to! They own the code. If RMS, for some reason, decides that he doesn't
like the phrasing of a comment somewhere, we have to either convince RMS
he's wrong or change the comment.
As a practical matter, the FSF *delegates* most of their responsibilities
to the maintainer of the package, but they can undo that delegation as to
any matter any time they want.
(
Log in to post comments)