| |||||||||||||
Conventions are great! Let's go back to FAT!Conventions are great! Let's go back to FAT!Posted Mar 29, 2009 21:44 UTC (Sun) by clugstj (subscriber, #4020)In reply to: Conventions are great! Let's go back to FAT! by khim Parent article: Wheeler: Fixing Unix/Linux/POSIX Filenames
"UNIX is not broken. Your head, on the other hand, is"
Wow, childish personal attacks. How droll.
"Number of correct scripts is not important metric. Number of bad scripts is"
I would think that the percentage of each would (possibly) be a useful metric. But, what is the damage from these "bad scripts"? If you are writing shell scripts that MUST be absoutely bullet-proof from bad input, perhaps because they run setuid-root, then you are already making a much worse mistake than the possible bugs in the script.
Still don't understand the FAT reference. Sorry, maybe I'm just slow.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||