| |||||||||||||
Garrett: ext4, application expectations and power managementGarrett: ext4, application expectations and power managementPosted Mar 16, 2009 17:56 UTC (Mon) by flewellyn (subscriber, #5047)In reply to: Garrett: ext4, application expectations and power management by neilbrown Parent article: Garrett: ext4, application expectations and power management
That's a fair question. I think the main issue is the level of abstraction: databases are more abstract than filesystems, and depend on properly working filesystems for their correct operation. A database is one particular application of data storage, while a filesystem is a general mechanism for data storage.
(Log in to post comments)
Garrett: ext4, application expectations and power management Posted Mar 17, 2009 14:46 UTC (Tue) by Wol (guest, #4433) [Link]
Data bases depend on filesystems for their correct operation?
What about native Pick, where the database IS the filesystem?
Or Oracle, where it's configured to use raw partitions for data storage?
Cheers,
Garrett: ext4, application expectations and power management Posted Mar 17, 2009 17:58 UTC (Tue) by flewellyn (subscriber, #5047) [Link]
I'd argue that those databases implement their own filesystems.
|
|||||||||||||