| |||||||||||||
Semantic is NOT the sameSemantic is NOT the samePosted Mar 15, 2009 20:56 UTC (Sun) by khim (subscriber, #9252)In reply to: ordered(tm) brand by nybble41 Parent article: Garrett: ext4, application expectations and power management
From user POV semantic is wildly different: with Ext3 I'm guaranteed my P2P state will not be corrupt - no five seconds window. With Ext4 I'm almost guranteed it'll be destroyed in crash. Big difference. Granted - it looked like "more-or-less" the same mode from filesystem developer POV, but that's no excuse... May be it's accident, may be not - but semantic of ext3 and ext4 ordered case was quite different...
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||