Not logged in
Log in now
Create an account
Subscribe to LWN
LWN.net Weekly Edition for December 5, 2013
Deadline scheduling: coming soon?
LWN.net Weekly Edition for November 27, 2013
ACPI for ARM?
LWN.net Weekly Edition for November 21, 2013
- Since mv doesn't fsync and mv is expected to leave things in a sane state after a crash, the kernel must be expected to "do the right thing" wrt rename().
- Since mv doesn't sync, mv is not guaranteed to leave things in a sane state after a crash; if you thought that it was guaranteed to do so you were wrong.
Posted Mar 14, 2009 15:25 UTC (Sat) by man_ls (guest, #15091)
But on a journalled fs like ext3 users will expect their system to be robust in the event of a crash -- and as the XFS debacle shows, not only for metadata. Both are POSIX-compliant, only ext3 is held to higher standards than ext2. What this means for ext4 is obvious.
Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds