| |||||||||||||
Ts'o: Delayed allocation and the zero-length file problemTs'o: Delayed allocation and the zero-length file problemPosted Mar 13, 2009 16:19 UTC (Fri) by ajross (subscriber, #4563)In reply to: Ts'o: Delayed allocation and the zero-length file problem by rsidd Parent article: Ts'o: Delayed allocation and the zero-length file problem Agreed. What's the point of putting all these fancy journaling and reliability features into a file system if they don't work by default? I mean, hell, we could lose data after a system crash with ufs in 1983. Why bother with ext4? Hiding behind POSIX here is just ridiculous. POSIX allows this absurd lack of reliability not because it's a good idea, but because filesystems available when the standard was drafted can't support it.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||