> Exactly why does this publication give any mention of ... that distribution?
Possibly because the Editors of this publication consider it more productive to write thoughtful, considered articles analysing the various sides of the Novell-Microsoft deal (e.g. http://lwn.net/Articles/235940/) than to pretend it doesn't exist and ban all mention of it?
I might even go so far as to say that the majority of LWN readers greatly appreciate such a stance, as a refreshing change from the usual mindless groupthink of Slashdot et al...