| |||||||||||||
Open Invention Network or LF?Open Invention Network or LF?Posted Feb 27, 2009 14:49 UTC (Fri) by forthy (guest, #1525)In reply to: Open Invention Network or LF? by kragil Parent article: Microsoft sues TomTom
Yes, IMHO this is the main reason something like OIN was created first hand. And Microsoft definitely should know that their action is a call for "nuke me". I'm sure they are vulnerable on the patent front, but if they want real war, they should worry a lot more: Conficker's writers are just a few criminal seeking for a botnet, they are not Linux hackers at war ;-). The other front line of course is the US patent system. E.g. the FAT patent was disputed between 2004 and 2006, and finally, this completely bogus patent was reinstated. While in 2007, a German court ruled out that it is neither new (the Rock Ridge Extension to ISO CDs solves the same problem in the patented way before VFAT), and not an invention anyway (it does not go beyond common state of the art practice). If you have some contact with Obama's team, make clear to them that the current patent system in the US is stifling innovations, and that the solution is to at least ban all patents that were granted during the past decades, where the rules were so lax that every horseshit went through as novel "apparatus for attracting flies".
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||