| |||||||||||||
BilskiBilskiPosted Feb 26, 2009 1:59 UTC (Thu) by dmarti (subscriber, #11625)In reply to: is there a place to contribute prior art? by JoeBuck Parent article: Microsoft sues TomTom Bilski isn't the one about obviousness -- it's the one about a new btest for software patentability: how much of a real-world effect does software have to produce in order to be a patentable process and not an unpatentable mathematical fact. KSR v. Teleflex was about the test for obviousness. We still don't know how the two tests will interact.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||