| |||||||||||||
FAT patentFAT patentPosted Feb 26, 2009 1:23 UTC (Thu) by mcisely (subscriber, #2860)In reply to: FAT patent by corbet Parent article: Microsoft sues TomTom
...and according to pubpat, this patent was completely rejected:
http://www.pubpat.org/Microsoft_517_Rejected.htm
So how can Microsoft still be using it as a basis for a lawsuit? Did they not get the memo?
-Mike
(Log in to post comments)
FAT patent Posted Feb 26, 2009 2:05 UTC (Thu) by corbet (editor, #1) [Link] Pubpat didn't quite get around to updating their pages to reflect the reinstatement of this patent in 2006.
|
|||||||||||||