|| ||Dave Hansen <dave-AT-linux.vnet.ibm.com>|
|| ||Oren Laadan <orenl-AT-cs.columbia.edu>|
|| ||Re: [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart|
|| ||Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:05:47 -0800|
|| ||Andrew Morton <akpm-AT-linux-foundation.org>, linux-api-AT-vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm-AT-kvack.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds-AT-osdl.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro-AT-zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-AT-zytor.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx-AT-linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo-AT-elte.hu>|
|| ||Article, Thread
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 12:07 -0500, Oren Laadan wrote:
> Checkpoint-restart (c/r): a couple of fixes in preparation for 64bit
> architectures, and a couple of fixes for bugss (comments from Serge
> Hallyn, Sudakvev Bhattiprolu and Nathan Lynch). Updated and tested
> against v2.6.28.
> Aiming for -mm.
Is there anything that we're waiting on before these can go into -mm? I
think the discussion on the first few patches has died down to almost
nothing. They're pretty reviewed-out. Do they need a run in -mm? I
don't think linux-next is quite appropriate since they're not _quite_
aimed at mainline yet.
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to email@example.com. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"firstname.lastname@example.org"> email@example.com </a>
to post comments)