Re: [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart [LWN.net]

From:		Dave Hansen <dave-AT-linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:		Oren Laadan <orenl-AT-cs.columbia.edu>
Subject:		Re: [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart
Date:		Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:05:47 -0800
Message-ID:		<1234285547.30155.6.camel@nimitz>
Cc:		Andrew Morton <akpm-AT-linux-foundation.org>, linux-api-AT-vger.kernel.org, containers-AT-lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org, linux-mm-AT-kvack.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds-AT-osdl.org>, Alexander Viro <viro-AT-zeniv.linux.org.uk>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-AT-zytor.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx-AT-linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo-AT-elte.hu>
Archive-link:		Article, Thread

On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 12:07 -0500, Oren Laadan wrote:
> Checkpoint-restart (c/r): a couple of fixes in preparation for 64bit
> architectures, and a couple of fixes for bugss (comments from Serge
> Hallyn, Sudakvev Bhattiprolu and Nathan Lynch). Updated and tested
> against v2.6.28.
> 
> Aiming for -mm.

Is there anything that we're waiting on before these can go into -mm?  I
think the discussion on the first few patches has died down to almost
nothing.  They're pretty reviewed-out.  Do they need a run in -mm?  I
don't think linux-next is quite appropriate since they're not _quite_
aimed at mainline yet.

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

(Log in to post comments)