LWN.net Logo

Re: Shouldn't distros and ISVs ensure that security updates get deployed promptly?

From:  Dan Kegel <dank-AT-kegel.com>
To:  Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs-AT-researchut.com>
Subject:  Re: Shouldn't distros and ISVs ensure that security updates get deployed promptly?
Date:  Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:21:32 -0800
Message-ID:  <a71bd89a0902040821m10a0bfdbr479ad14bd0238925@mail.gmail.com>
Cc:  desktop_architects-AT-lists.linux-foundation.org
Archive-link:  Article, Thread

Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@researchut.com> wrote:
> Should the user really want silent updates ?
> For updates with priority "security", I think it should just pop-up more
> often.

People ignore dialogs like that.   IMHO if we're going to avoid
botnet nightmares, we're going to need at least some silent security updates.

> But if someone really needs it, it should be do-able (Assuming one is not on a
> rolling-release)
> apt ships a /etc/cron.daily/apt script.
> So with the following in place:
> APT {
>  Get {
>     Assume-Yes "true";
>     Upgrade "true";
> } }
> One should be able to achieve silent updates

assume-yes sounds dangerous.  And that whole change seems
rather global, unless I misunderstand.  I don't want to change
the entire system update policy, just the policy for apps with
crucial security updates.
- Dan


(Log in to post comments)

Copyright © 2009, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds