Re: Shouldn't distros and ISVs ensure that
security updates get deployed promptly?
[Posted February 11, 2009 by jake]
| From: |
| Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs-AT-researchut.com> |
| To: |
| desktop_architects-AT-lists.linux-foundation.org |
| Subject: |
| Re: Shouldn't distros and ISVs ensure that
security updates get deployed promptly? |
| Date: |
| Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:44:46 +0530 |
| Message-ID: |
| <200902042144.48626.rrs@researchut.com> |
| Cc: |
| Dan Kegel <dank-AT-kegel.com> |
| Archive-link: |
| Article, Thread
|
On Wednesday 04 Feb 2009 21:08:07 Dan Kegel wrote:
> The question is how to reliably trigger silent
> daily updates, and to do it in a way that does not
> surprise/disappoint/annoy users or administrators.
Should the user really want silent updates ?
For updates with priority "security", I think it should just pop-up more
often.
But if someone really needs it, it should be do-able (Assuming one is not on a
rolling-release)
apt ships a /etc/cron.daily/apt script.
So with the following in place:
APT {
Get {
Assume-Yes "true";
Upgrade "true";
} }
One should be able to achieve silent updates (Assuming good QA is done on the
update packages).
Ritesh
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."
_______________________________________________
Desktop_architects mailing list
Desktop_architects@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/deskt...
(
Log in to post comments)