Shouldn't distros and ISVs ensure that
security updates get deployed promptly?
[Posted February 11, 2009 by jake]
| From: |
| Dan Kegel <dank-AT-kegel.com> |
| To: |
| Desktop_architects-AT-lists.linux-foundation.org |
| Subject: |
| Shouldn't distros and ISVs ensure that
security updates get deployed promptly? |
| Date: |
| Tue, 3 Feb 2009 23:41:50 -0800 |
| Message-ID: |
| <a71bd89a0902032341w24851539pfe8c73e5e297c78f@mail.gmail.com> |
| Archive-link: |
| Article, Thread
|
Security updates in current linux distros are
optional, right? i.e. in Ubuntu 8.10, it
*offers* updates to you every time you
log in. And (though I should know better),
I often ignore that message, so my systems
are days out of date.
Given how much malware is out there,
shouldn't security fixes for remotely exploitable
flaws be installed a bit more forcefully?
e.g. instead of an ignorable notification,
how about an in-your-face dialog saying
they're going to be installed now?
Or in some cases even just silently installing them?
This goes not just for distros; any ISVs is on
the hook for rapid security updates these days,
I would think.
This isn't an idle question... the ISV I work
for is pondering how to package its app
and how to push out security updates to all customers
promptly.
I can't recall any standard mechanisms to make this
happen other than, um, having the package install
a daily crontab script to update itself via the appropriate
"apt-get install foo" or "yum install foo" command.
(That sounds awful forceful, but I think lots of shops
do this kind of update of the whole system, so perhaps
an ISV doing it for just their one app wouldn't be too
controversial. Ha.)
- Dan
(
Log in to post comments)