Fedora with GNOME is no better [LWN.net]

Fedora with GNOME is no better

Posted Feb 1, 2009 0:30 UTC (Sun) by malor (subscriber, #2973)
In reply to: Fedora with GNOME is no better by jospoortvliet
Parent article: KDE 4, distributors, and bleeding-edge software

End users were simply not the target for this release

You have explicitly said you called it 4.0 to get more testing; I'd say that users were exactly the target for the release. You wanted them to start yelling at other teams to fix the bugs you wanted fixed. You deliberately inflicted pain on your userbase so that they would browbeat other teams into doing things the way you wanted.

But, guess what? You're writing a desktop. If you're not completely focused on users, you're doing it wrong. You deliberately inflicted pain on people to make your own lives easier, and you did it through deception. And you seem to believe that it was even worth it, while GNOME keeps eating you. You're losing, and you are losing because the people who vote, the users, aren't the people you're really trying to help.

Remember: Linux users are generally developers of other projects. Their time is worth at least as much as yours.

we did it for other,equally (if not more) important reasons.

You're focused on your own team's needs intead of the needs of the broader public. This is damaging you, badly. If you don't want to focus on users first, then pick a different type of project.

(Log in to post comments)

Fedora with GNOME is no better

Posted Feb 1, 2009 11:47 UTC (Sun) by jospoortvliet (subscriber, #33164) [Link]

Sure the final goal for what we do is for users. You are right in that. At the same time, what would benefit the users most? Having a good, stable KDE in 2009 or making them wait for 2010? We wanted to move as fast as possible. If we wouldn't have released 4.0 in 2008, we would have slowed development (or, not accelerated it) and KDE 4.x would still be a lot less mature.

You can look at it either way - the short term annoyances were worth the trouble. I honestly believe time will prove us right.

Thanks for KDE 3.5.10!

Posted Feb 1, 2009 13:44 UTC (Sun) by mgb (guest, #3226) [Link]

"what would benefit the users most? Having a good, stable KDE in 2009"

Fortunately there is a good, stable KDE in 2009. It's 3.5.10.

Many thanks to the subset of KDE developers who are still supporting their stable 3.x series, even while experimenting with new ideas (some good some bad) in the 4.x development series.