OLPC 2.0: After Layoffs, One Laptop Foundation Reboots With New Focus and Big Plans (Xconomy)
Kane and Negroponte stressed, though, that Sugar might be able to work in conjunction with Windows, just as it does with Linux. 'Sugar is terrific software for early childhood learning,' says Kane. 'There's a lot of elements that make it very unique and very powerful.' He says OLPC hopes to keep working closely with Bender and Sugar Labs in the future. 'We believe that the future product that's produced out of there will be very instrumental in what we have to offer.'"
Posted Jan 29, 2009 21:36 UTC (Thu)
by ballombe (subscriber, #9523)
[Link] (6 responses)
Posted Jan 29, 2009 21:44 UTC (Thu)
by khim (subscriber, #9252)
[Link] (5 responses)
Posted Jan 30, 2009 8:11 UTC (Fri)
by drag (guest, #31333)
[Link] (4 responses)
Languages are meant, especially English, by design to be ambiguous. Any sort of communication is going to be very incapable of delivering what is in one's mind to another person's. Communication between random strangers is going to be very lossy.. only a tiny fraction of the thoughts that people want to implant in a string of text will make it through non-mangled.
So ambiguous is often very good because it will help slow down a person and make them ponder the implications of what is being said. Context always matters very heavily; written communication especially. Repetition is good, too.
:)
Posted Jan 30, 2009 19:02 UTC (Fri)
by pr1268 (guest, #24648)
[Link] (1 responses)
Thanks for the thoughtful and interesting perspective... I actually had to go look up terrific at Dictionary.com to fully understand ballombe's post, and although I haven't used the Sugar interface (nor the OLPC XO), I've read enough user comments over the past 2 years to understand how appropriate khim's comment is. This limitation of communication is both a bug and a feature. :)
Posted Jan 30, 2009 21:09 UTC (Fri)
by luya (subscriber, #50741)
[Link]
Posted Jan 30, 2009 23:28 UTC (Fri)
by riddochc (guest, #43)
[Link]
Beg pardon? Natural language? Design? :)
Posted Jan 31, 2009 3:45 UTC (Sat)
by stephen_pollei (guest, #23348)
[Link]
All human level languages probably have to have measure of semantic ambiguity, however keeping semantic ambiguity to a minimum, and eliminating other forms of ambiguity seems like a good design goal. As far as I know only lojban , loglan, and it's derivatives have attempted to do so.
Also ambiguity shouldn't be confused with vagueness or imprecision; "the price of infinite precision is infinite verbosity" and "the map can never be the terrain". Someone once referred to languages as a form of lossy compression and I think that might be an apt metaphor -- that can never change. Also context does matter; humans almost always rely on context to provide some of the information that their communications leave out, anything less would be too inefficient.
However I don't see ambiguity as being helpful aspects of natural languages; rather I see them as minor speed-bumps which people of normal intelligence easily overcome -- and as a natural by product of being accumulated and accreted over by mostly unconscience choices over a large span of time.
Posted Jan 30, 2009 18:07 UTC (Fri)
by roblucid (guest, #48964)
[Link] (6 responses)
Presumably those responsible for the XO Windows moves have resigned, or are being held accountable for this? If the advertising had been donations, alot more children would have received laptops.
Posted Jan 30, 2009 18:14 UTC (Fri)
by dlang (guest, #313)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Jan 31, 2009 15:43 UTC (Sat)
by roblucid (guest, #48964)
[Link]
Nick's new friends just haven't come through for him, have they?
Posted Jan 30, 2009 18:35 UTC (Fri)
by fandom (subscriber, #4028)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Jan 30, 2009 18:59 UTC (Fri)
by amk (subscriber, #19)
[Link]
Posted Feb 3, 2009 10:44 UTC (Tue)
by hppnq (guest, #14462)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Feb 6, 2009 19:00 UTC (Fri)
by leoc (guest, #39773)
[Link]
Sugar is terrific software
like terrific. "Sugar is terrific software" can be read both way...
Sugar is both interesting idea and awful implementation so it's apt
description...
And it SHOULD be read both ways
And it SHOULD be read both ways
The ambiguity of "Terrific"
The ambiguity of "Terrific"
Languages are meant, especially English, by design...
And it SHOULD be read both ways
ambiguity considered harmful
PC switches to Windows, sales collapse
PC switches to Windows, sales collapse
PC switches to Windows, sales collapse
hatchet job, we could expect on ZDnet if "Linux support" was deemed a
failure that cost sales. The plans and loss of focus, undermined the
platform, at time they needed idealistic contributions to do tedious things
like bug fixing.
PC switches to Windows, sales collapse
PC switches to Windows, sales collapse
It seems Negroponte has made so many friends in India, they decided to manufacture a $10 dollar laptop. It will be presented today.
PC switches to Windows, sales collapse
Yeah that didn't turn out well.
PC switches to Windows, sales collapse