LWN.net Logo

KDE 4, distributors, and bleeding-edge software

KDE 4, distributors, and bleeding-edge software

Posted Jan 29, 2009 2:58 UTC (Thu) by jengelh (subscriber, #33263)
Parent article: KDE 4, distributors, and bleeding-edge software

>"KDE 4.0.0 is our 'will eat your children' release of KDE4, not the next release of KDE 3.5" is how Seigo described it. [...] Seigo also minces few words when pointing to the distributions to take a large part of that blame.

KDE needs to rethink the way it tags version numbers onto its tarballs. However you roll it, x.0 should be a release that does not eat .. whatever, and if that means you have to subtract the number 2 from every release you make (4.0 -> think of something like 3.98 or 4.0-beta1; 4.2 -> 4.0).

Some packagers working for a given distro will even avoid putting "-alpha", "-beta" or even -RCs into the official large repository (the thing that becomes "$DISTRO $VERSION" in its usual turnaround cycle), probably because they have been bitten again and again. Experimentophile users can still download it through 2nd/3rd-party repos like in $SUSE_OBS.

And maybe one should take Linus's words “if you're not/can't do X, you're not worth using” and apply it to $DISTRO. So if $MAJOR_DISTRO $NEW_VERSION does not provide a fallback to $DE $VERSION.x when knowing that $DE $(X+1).0 is not ready, maybe it is time (for the user) to consider to s/// their $DISTRO.

Hooray for variables.


(Log in to post comments)

KDE 4, distributors, and bleeding-edge software

Posted Jan 31, 2009 21:12 UTC (Sat) by jospoortvliet (subscriber, #33164) [Link]

please read the comments before posting. Your proposal might sound sane to
you, but would've been bad for KDE and the Free Desktop.

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds