Posted Jan 27, 2009 6:57 UTC (Tue) by nikanth (guest, #50093)
[Link]
Or moonlight ;) The Obama inagural speech was done with it!
"We're Linux" video contest kicks off
Posted Jan 27, 2009 16:00 UTC (Tue) by leoc (subscriber, #39773)
[Link]
Nope. Same problem. You had to download proprietary Microsoft plugins to watch the Obama inauguration on Linux, too.
"We're Linux" video contest kicks off
Posted Jan 29, 2009 21:40 UTC (Thu) by lakeland (subscriber, #1157)
[Link]
Hmmm? Please explain? Moonlight is a proprietary Microsoft Plugin?
"We're Linux" video contest kicks off
Posted Jan 27, 2009 16:48 UTC (Tue) by proski (subscriber, #104)
[Link]
swfdec 0.8.4 is not working. That's a shame. There are free flash players that work with swfdec.
"We're Linux" video contest kicks off
Posted Jan 27, 2009 17:26 UTC (Tue) by JungleJazz (guest, #56346)
[Link]
Chasing after every closed format is not the solution here. Reverse-engineering may have legal protections in some countries, but even those protections are not ironclad. Building a free software framework, based on reverse-engineering, is building a house on an unstable foundation. The framework may support itself for a short while, and it is a great benefit when you need it, but it is not a long-term solution. Reverse-engineering software functionality risks patent-holder litigation and claims of contaminated code.
Kudos to the Gnash and swfdec programmers, who, I believe, are compelling Adobe to slowly open their Flash technology. But what we ultimately want, for the online ecosystem, is a community-organized video framework, which is not beholden to only one corporate organization. We want a framework that works for everyone. Video is becoming the primary way we all communicate online, and it is vital it remains an open and freely distributable technology.
"We're Linux" video contest kicks off
Posted Jan 27, 2009 23:46 UTC (Tue) by drag (subscriber, #31333)
[Link]