Semantic patching with Coccinelle
Posted Jan 21, 2009 10:48 UTC (Wed) by Yorick
In reply to: Semantic patching with Coccinelle
Parent article: Semantic patching with Coccinelle
First, many thanks to Valerie Henson for an excellent article and for reminding us of the existence of Coccinelle which appears to be a fine tool.
But I must agree with Thue. Statements on the form X is written in Y, so the potential developer base is somewhat limited where Y is a language not well-known by the speaker are misleading. Any competent and motivated programmer will quickly learn a language such as ML, Scheme or Haskell in order to contribute to a project.
We are not talking about exoticisms like Befunge or Brainfuck here but standard, well-known, well-documented and widely-taught languages. A notation well suited to the task makes the task easier; for nontrivial applications, the complexity lies in the problem domain. Anyone who has worked with GCC will attest that the fact that it is (mostly) written in C does not make it easier to understand.
to post comments)