| |||||||||||||
Who is the best inliner of all?Who is the best inliner of all?Posted Jan 19, 2009 9:12 UTC (Mon) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313)In reply to: Who is the best inliner of all? by michaeljt Parent article: Who is the best inliner of all?
for the symbol resolution to be done later, someone will have to manually transcribe the oops message (most of the time), when the kernel knows that it's in bad shape you really don't want to have it writing to a disk (it may end up writing over your data)
Linus' statement about digital cameras being are more useful than crash dumps for kernel debugging is becouse it's easy to take a picture of an oops and send it out, it's much more work (and therefor fewer people bother) to gather the oops in other ways.
(Log in to post comments)
Who is the best inliner of all? Posted Jan 23, 2009 22:41 UTC (Fri) by oak (guest, #2786) [Link]
> for the symbol resolution to be done later, someone will have to
> manually transcribe the oops message (most of the time), when > the kernel knows that it's in bad shape you really don't want > to have it writing to a disk (it may end up writing over your data)
Maybe on production systems, but on test systems you really do want those
If disk is too risky for Oops information, send them to serial or over
|
|||||||||||||