| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Sometimes context is more important than contentSometimes context is more important than contentPosted Jan 13, 2009 2:20 UTC (Tue) by qg6te2 (guest, #52587)In reply to: Sometimes context is more important than content by jspaleta Parent article: A Software Populist Who Doesn't Do Windows (New York Times) Canonical is leveraging a large pool of unpaid labor in the Ubuntu community in an effort to create a sustainable business. Just like Red Hat, de facto managing Fedora, largely for the purposes of making a beta for RHEL (in spite of all the smoke and mirrors in an attempt to make Fedora appear as an "indenpendent" distro). (Disclaimer: I use Fedora and contribute to it. My frustration is with the freewheeling attitude which comes to non-QA'd updates that break systems. The likelihood of this happening on RHEL is much lower, and I sincerely wish Red Hat would apply the RHEL QA process to Fedora).
(Log in to post comments)
Sometimes context is more important than content Posted Jan 13, 2009 6:34 UTC (Tue) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]
Well, with the majority of package maintainers being non-Red Hat volunteers, that wouldn't be Red Hat's decision. Within the Fedora space, it would primarily be the job of Fedora's QA team and FESCo but I think before asking for RHEL's QA process, you would do well to understand what it is. For one, I don't think it would fit at all
|
|
||||||||||||