| |||||||||||||
That's the setup I have - and HATE itThat's the setup I have - and HATE itPosted Jan 8, 2009 20:11 UTC (Thu) by roblucid (subscriber, #48964)In reply to: That's the setup I have - and HATE it by dlang Parent article: Btrfs aims for the mainline
> defining the redundancy for each file as it is saved will also require
> changes to every single program out there, which is very unlikely to happen.
Probably a lot of ppl still expect filesystems to be fast, and having every node in the hierarchy and all files, having some different form of backing storage depending on redundancy requirements... *sucks through teeth* sounds expensive to me.
The "I want to know nothing" and just have it managed by some kind of Storage management system that takes care of details, does sound a better requirement to me.
Actually I don't think "every program" would need modifying, as when files are created, they can inherit the characteristics of the parent directory, as would new sub-directories.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||