Not logged in
Log in now
Create an account
Subscribe to LWN
LWN.net Weekly Edition for May 16, 2013
A look at the PyPy 2.0 release
PostgreSQL 9.3 beta: Federated databases and more
LWN.net Weekly Edition for May 9, 2013
(Nearly) full tickless operation in 3.10
I like eye candy, but not enough to make it be the primary criteria by which I select a window manager.
WM vs. Library
Posted Jan 10, 2009 0:20 UTC (Sat) by Tet (subscriber, #5433)
Posted Jan 10, 2009 15:24 UTC (Sat) by kirkengaard (subscriber, #15022)
Except for the fact that KDE has gone the built-in-effects-library route for themselves, in a big and usable KDE-internal way, and lobbying freedesktop.org to make it a standard library will just make it a Gnome compile necessity, something Gnome is just *begging* for more of.
(Cue flames from the remaining FVWM users out there... :) )
The free software ecosystem is like any other evolutionary environment, in that it pursues all branches into all niches, and lets the environmental and competitive constraints do the pruning. We've seen it before, and we'll see it again. A project's value proposition is a description of the niche value, not the value of the specific code that occupies it. Competition is for niche occupancy, and maybe the niche is taken, in which case the survival option is to evolve to a niche that is more available.
Posted Jan 10, 2009 15:50 UTC (Sat) by Tet (subscriber, #5433)
For me, it's essential. Whether people realise it or not, they're still
using a window manager, even if they're using GNOME or KDE. And having
a capable window manager makes the user much more productive.
Perhaps that's why I'm one of those remaining FVWM users you mentioned...
Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds