Windows Server 2003 better than Linux (Inquirer)

Windows Server 2003 better than Linux (Inquirer)

Posted May 7, 2003 9:55 UTC (Wed) by standby (guest, #9796)
Parent article: Windows Server 2003 better than Linux (Inquirer)

Wo!!! Excellent experiments _mislead_ people!!

"Peak" isn't a good metric (the counter-example given by backtick tells why it is so). No guy in networking field will tell you that higher "peak" throughput implies better performance.

Only naive guy will take this measurement to say it is better.

Also, can Red Hat really represent all Linux distributions? I think they should mind their words used.

---

(Log in to post comments)