Advertisement
Advanced thin client solution for Linux, based on Open Source. Mix Windows and Linux applications on the same desktop.
Sponsored link
Serve your customers, not your servers, with VERIO Linux VPS. Full-access test-drive here.
| Weekly edition | Kernel | Security | Distributions | Search |
| Archives | Calendar | Subscribe | Write for LWN | LWN.net FAQ |
Windows Server 2003 better than Linux ??
Windows Server 2003 better than Linux ??
Posted May 7, 2003 4:59 UTC (Wed) by Baylink (subscriber, #755)In reply to: Windows Server 2003 better than Linux ?? by neoprene
Parent article: Windows Server 2003 better than Linux (Inquirer)
I've seen press today that Merrill Lynch has downgraded their stock to
"neutral", precisely because of the danger to them from Linux (in the
person of IBM, mostly, but still)...
Our Plans For World Domination may be speeding up.
(Log in to post comments)
Merrill Lynch downgrades Microsoft
Posted May 10, 2003 16:03 UTC (Sat) by rwmj (subscriber, #5474) [Link]
More likely it's because Microsoft has been running an Enron-style accounting scam (legally, I hasten to add) for the last few years. They've actually been making loses & have a huge undisclosed liability.See: http://www.billparish.com/msftfraudfacts.html for the basics and and the updates section of the site for further news.
Rich.