Sponsored link Serve your customers, not your servers, with VERIO Linux VPS. Full-access test-drive here. |
Windows Server 2003 better than Linux ??Windows Server 2003 better than Linux ??Posted May 7, 2003 2:45 UTC (Wed) by neoprene (guest, #8520)In reply to: Linux has arrived! by mark Parent article: Windows Server 2003 better than Linux (Inquirer)
This report begs more questions than it answers. Synthetic benchmarks are usually flawed, I dont know about this one. Just the fact that MS paid for the test makes it suspicious. What other tests have they paid for and _not_ published?
(Log in to post comments)
Windows Server 2003 better than Linux ?? Posted May 7, 2003 4:59 UTC (Wed) by Baylink (subscriber, #755) [Link] I've seen press today that Merrill Lynch has downgraded their stock to"neutral", precisely because of the danger to them from Linux (in the person of IBM, mostly, but still)... Our Plans For World Domination may be speeding up.
Merrill Lynch downgrades Microsoft Posted May 10, 2003 16:03 UTC (Sat) by rwmj (subscriber, #5474) [Link] More likely it's because Microsoft has been running an Enron-style accounting scam (legally, I hasten to add) for the last few years. They've actually been making loses & have a huge undisclosed liability.See: http://www.billparish.com/msftfraudfacts.html for the basics and and the updates section of the site for further news. Rich.
|
Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds
Powered by Rackspace Managed Hosting.