Sponsored link
Serve your customers, not your servers, with VERIO Linux VPS. Full-access test-drive here.
| Weekly edition | Kernel | Security | Distributions | Search |
| Archives | Calendar | Subscribe | Write for LWN | LWN.net FAQ |
Windows Server 2003 better than Linux (Inquirer)
Windows Server 2003 better than Linux (Inquirer)
Posted May 7, 2003 0:10 UTC (Wed) by DaveK (subscriber, #2531)In reply to: Windows Server 2003 better than Linux (Inquirer) by southey
Parent article: Windows Server 2003 better than Linux (Inquirer)
Seems very reminisent of the Mindcr*p HPPTD tests of a couple of years ago using stock RH boxen and extremely uber tweaked redmond boxes that, when competent Linux admins turned up and tweaked the RH boxen for the re-run, were shown to be somewhat bogus.
how often do we get such test results, but I have yet to find anyone who, in a real world installation, has attained anything other than the reverse of the published results.
Oh well...
(Log in to post comments)
Windows Server 2003 better than Linux (Inquirer)
Posted May 8, 2003 20:26 UTC (Thu) by dsime (guest, #5764) [Link]
You might also remember that that test was what caused MAJOR changes to the kernel's tasking code. Windows WAS better, then Linux was improved. I hope this whacked benchmark will cause a similar improvement in Linux.