| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
The GNOME DVCS surveyThe GNOME DVCS surveyPosted Jan 5, 2009 23:51 UTC (Mon) by jengelh (subscriber, #33263)In reply to: The GNOME DVCS survey by roskegg Parent article: The GNOME DVCS survey
From what I have heard about darcs, I would say it is its hydra commit management ( http://utsl.gen.nz/talks/git-svn/hydra-vs-regular.png ) that would worry me most.
(Log in to post comments)
The GNOME DVCS survey Posted Jan 6, 2009 23:20 UTC (Tue) by Ze (subscriber, #54182) [Link]
>from what I have heard about darcs, I would say it is its hydra commit management ( http://utsl.gen.nz/talks/git-svn/hydra-vs-regular.png ) that would worry me most.
See that hydra commit management looks better than the normal commit to me.
|
|
||||||||||||
