| |||||||||||||
My misunderstanding! But thought-provokingMy misunderstanding! But thought-provokingPosted Dec 19, 2008 9:05 UTC (Fri) by grahamperrin (guest, #55680)In reply to: On topic: using collections, not mis-understanding the dashboard by grahamperrin Parent article: Chandler finally reaches a 1.0 release
I am wrong!
Sometimes it helps to think aloud (write) before I realise such things.
Indeed, this behaviour is interesting.
My first guess:
* it's not usual to delete some thing.
More usual:
* change the nature of the thing.
Changing its nature may be:
* triage to: done
Let's rewind.
Q: Why did you create the item? (If it wasn't a note, task, event, whatever, then what was it?)
The question of most relevance:
Q: Why did you immediately delete it?
(Log in to post comments)
Reasons for immediately deleting something Posted Dec 19, 2008 9:09 UTC (Fri) by grahamperrin (guest, #55680) [Link]
In testing: I might wish to immediately delete some thing that is not real.
In real life: I add real things to Chandler.
I suspect that this workflow issue is perceived only when working with items (notes, events, tasks,
If what you entered in Chandler was a passing thought, worthy of noting, even momentarily:
* allow yourself that thought.
Your thought was real. In Chandler, mark your note of that momentary thought as:
* done.
|
|||||||||||||