| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
This is NOT a Linux vs. BSD (distribution) issueThis is NOT a Linux vs. BSD (distribution) issuePosted Dec 13, 2008 13:54 UTC (Sat) by man_ls (subscriber, #15091)In reply to: This is NOT a Linux vs. BSD (distribution) issue by sepreece Parent article: Free Software Foundation files suit against Cisco for GPL violations But it is sufficient. According to GPLv2, 3.b: 3. You may copy and distribute the Program [...] provided that you also [...]: b) Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchangeA link qualifies as "written offer", the internet is a customary medium, and any reasonable person would be satisfied with that.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||