| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
If history is any indication...If history is any indication...Posted Dec 11, 2008 7:10 UTC (Thu) by khim (subscriber, #9252)In reply to: Python 2 now stable by ncm Parent article: Python 3 is out - now what?
Library writers are happy to jump to new version of any language. Months after python 2.5 was released first "python 2.5 only" libraries started to appear - and I fail to see why python 3.0 will be any different. I certainly will not switch all my scripts to python 3.0 right away but if I'll start anything new today - I'll do it with python 3.0: why feel the pain of incompatible switch down the road if you can start with newer version from the beginning?
(Log in to post comments)
If history is any indication... Posted Dec 17, 2008 7:09 UTC (Wed) by kbob (guest, #1770) [Link]
More importantly, why would you want to keep living with Python 2.0's warts? Pythonists are much more sensitive to issues of cleanliness than programmers of most languages *cough*Perl*cough*, so I expect the migration to happen pretty quickly.
|
|
||||||||||||